UA-33754892-1 Archives for 07 October 2018 | Jason Kelly Golf

Jason Kelly Golf

Golf Betting Tips

British Masters and CIMB Classic

The British Masters (In running after round 3)

0.25 points Julian Suri @ 9 (-0.25)

CIMB Classic (In running after round 3)

0.25 points Louis Oosthuizen @ 10 (-0.25)

The British Masters (In running after round 1)

1 point Tommy Fleetwood @ 4 (-1)
0.25 points Andy Sullivan @ 34 (-0.25)
0.25 points Ross Fisher @ 34 (-0.25)

CIMB Classic (In running after round 1)

0.4 points Paul Casey @ 12 (-0.4)
0.25 points Louis Oosthuizen @ 21 (-0.25)

The British Masters

In the British Masters at Walton Heath I have to say Justin Rose looks a very worthy favourite at 15/2, I would be nearer 4/1. I also like Fleetwood but he must be close to running out of steam. Rose is mega consistent, 9-2-19-mc-2-2-4 in his last 7. He doesn’t win easily and the forecast is poor, which may bring the field closer to him, but he loves this course and looks hard to beat. English winner at Winston Churchill’s home course would be cool…. Andrew ‘Beef Johnson’ has a great record here in US Open Qualifying, qualifying each of the last 3 years, 40/1 is fair but he’s not for me. I’ll stick with Rose.

To Win

0.5 points Justin Rose @ 8.5 (-0.5)

72 Hole Matches (Sky Bet - tie no bet)

1 points Thorbjorn Olesen to beat Bjeeregaard @ 1.83 (-1)
0.4 points Tom Lewis to beat Detry @ 1.83 (+0.33)
0.4 points Matt Wallace to beat Pavan @ 1.83 (push)

CIMB Classic

The PGA Tour are in Malaysia this week to play the first of their 3 week Asia swing. Moore won this in ’13 and ’14, Thomas in ’15 and ’16, Perez won last year. The course has been completely re-turfed with different grasses from last year. Hitting greens (new greens tend to be firmer before they settle) will be the key this week. I like Paul Casey at 20/1, I would have him half that price. I will also take a punt on Perez to return to a bit of form and keep the pattern of title defences going. 70/1 available, I would be 25/1.

To Win

0.25 points Paul Casey @ 21 (-0.25)
0.25 points Russel Henley @ 71 (-0.25)

72 Hole Matches (Sky Bet - tie no bet)

2 points Byeong-Hun An to bt Pan @ 1.73 (+1.46)
2 points Paul Casey to bt Horschel @ 1.91 (+1.82)
0.4 point Gary Woodland to bt Schaufelle @ 1.91 (+0.36)

This week's P&L = -0.68
This week’s investment = 9.85 points

This week's Outright P&L = -1
This weeks's Outright Investment = 1 points

This week's matches/specials/in running P&L = +0.32
This week's matches/specials/in running Investment = 8.85 points

2018 Total P&L =  -105.62 points

2018 Total Investment = 1868.24 points

2018 Outright Bets P&L = 
-34.73 points
2018 Outright Bets Investment = 885.94 points

2018 matches/specials/in running P&L =  -70.89 points
2018 matches/specials/in running investment = 983.69 points

2017 total -37.24 points
2016 total +3.88 points
2015 total -116.28 points
2014 total -103.98 points
2013 total - 24.22 points
2012 total +150.36 points
2011 total +370.78 points

2010 total +189.33 points
8 Year Total +432.63 points

To get the tips first and receive exclusive in running advice - send an email to with the subject ‘register'

Staking System

Updated 1st July 2018 - I have had quite a lot of feedback regarding the staking plan.  Serious betters generally like it, casual punters not so much.  

It is important to focus on bet size.  It is as, if not more important, than the selections themselves in regard to showing profit.  

It seems a suitable time, as we are halfway through the year, to change it too be better for both.

It is easy to keep the p&l record going, as I explained before, you could just divide the stakes by 10 and you would be representative of the previous staking plan, just without the round numbers.

The new staking stratergy, although similar to before (eg. If your normal bet is £10 then one point would equal £10) should work as a 'strength of bet guide' as well as a 'percentage of pot' guide.  So, if I allocate 1 point to a bet this could 1) Show you this is a standard bet size but also 2) what percentage of your betting bank to allocate to this selection.  Note the maximum percentage allocated to a bet would be 2% of your bank or 2 points, for odds on bets to win 2 points or 2%.

The points allocated to a bet reflect the size of our edge, the difference between the price available to bet and the price I think it should be, and are balanced in a way that proved most effective in back testing.

So if we have a;

2-5% edge I will allocate 0.25 points
5-8% edge 0.4 points
8-10% edge 0.5 points
10-12% edge 1 point
12-15% edge 1.5 ponts
15-20% edge 2 points

This is very similar to the strategy we have been using during the first half of the year.  The main difference is the percentage chance of our selection winning is not taken into account.  This may sound weird, but it makes the staking plan less volatile and also will reward big price winners much more.  Most of our profit is based around landing a big fish rather than lots of little ones.  It also doesn't make us so vulnerable to an attractive, short priced, large edged match bet where a stake is hugely inflated.  The old system would up the stakes perhaps too much on bets like this and a loss would wipe out any chance of winning on that week.

Again, this has been back tested.  The conclusion from these tests is a large, quick profit is less likely but it is a great plan for solid, steady, longterm growth.

2018 onwards - The updated staking plan incorporates a simple formula that calculates the proportion of your balance to wager on a particular gamble. The calculation determines a recommended stake based on prevailing odds and an estimated probability that the selection will win.

The strength of bet is still advised in points. These points are representative to your chosen bankroll. The ratio used in my advice is to an initial bank of 1000 points. So if this bank is £100, £1000 or £10000 is up to you. But 1 point to a bank of £100 will be £0.10, to £1000 £1, to £10,000 £10. In this respect it is the same as the old system. 

Back testing carried out on the previous 7 years selections has shown much larger profits on winning years and only a marginally higher loss in losing years. It will carry slightly higher volatility overall, but the testing has shown it to be a much better, more profitable and frankly more enjoyable system. 

Pre 2018 - The advice came with a point system to rate the strength of a tip. A '1 point' bet meant placing your usual stake, so if you would consider your normal bet being £10 then '1 point' signifies £10.